Ship's Blog - Fishermen's Finest

Talking trash

By Jessica Hathaway

Call them discards. Call it bycatch. Whatever you call it, it’s possibly the dirtiest little secret in fishery management. Yes, management. Discards are a signpost of a mismanaged fishery.

Of course the best solution is to not have any bycatch. But what we do about bycatch in the meantime is what separates our system (as one of the best-managed fishing nations in the world) from Fishery Management 101: So You Wanna Be a First World Country?

 

Enforcing discards and shutting down fisheries at certain thresholds is for management greenhorns. Throwing away fish is no way to sustain fish. Shutting down fishing is no way to sustain a fishery. These are things you do in a moment of crisis, not as a matter of course.

Right now our federal managers want us to focus on observer coverage. There’s a lot of money to be spent on that. And what is the point? To get someone to keep close track of what’s going on aboard fishing boats. I guarantee you the captain knows. And many of them would be willing to contribute to data gathering as long as managers are making an effort to work with them. Threatening someone’s livelihood is not the best way to secure their cooperation.

They will also tell you how much of a waste it is to discard bycatch. And most fishermen will tell you their opinion on what gear type is really ruining things for everyone (and there’s no consensus on that topic). But I sincerely hope you don’t fall into that trap. Divided we fall. If you think no one will go after your gear, just wait.

Meanwhile, we have options for bycatch: allow boats to donate it to SeaShare or school lunch programs. That way we can actually track it. Observers need not apply. Simply make the accounting program anonymous. See where that gets you.

Then spend the money you are scrounging up for observer coverage and put it directly into gear research. Every single fishery could actually use that. Most of the significant marine science tools come from military projects — federally funded — and are adapted over time to be used by fishermen. Why can’t we put a fraction of that cost toward fishing-specific gear research? We talk a really good game about sustainable fishing. But the best way to be sustainable is to be selective, and we commit few resources to improving selectivity. Instead, our system says repeatedly, “Hey fishermen, can you just not fish for the stuff you can’t land?” That’s not helpful, and it’s not working.

We can solve bycatch problems with the right gear set the right way at the right time. But in most cases, we will need to work with fishermen to get the details just so. So what do you say, NOAA and NMFS? Can you work with us?

We believe safety isn't an accident - you have to work proactively to maintain a safe workplace and to train a safe workforce.  That is why we encourage our crew to better themselves by attending safety courses offered through organazations such as

Not only do we encourage our crew, we step up to the plate and pay for our crew to attend.  Further, a more trained crewmember will move up in the pay scale aboard the vessels.  It's a win-win-win.

Listed below are just a few of the safety training opportunities that are out there:

 June 27, 2015 Commentary by Shannyn Moore - Let that Barn Door go, fisherman, and we'll have halibut for years to come 

 

Here are my notes from Clem Tillion’s testimony today before the North Pacific Fishery Management Council in Sitka, Alaska:

Mr. Tillion was there representing the Aleut Enterprise Corporation:

Advocating Individual vessel responsibility - Sacred cows make the best hamburger

Let’s chew some up:

Throwing back halibut over 26” = wastage

It’s not biological it’s economic - Keep 26” and above fish

Stop throwing them over – immoral to throw back.

Recommend the Council notify the IPHC that anything over 26” thrown back is a crime against the biology.

If they won’t do it, let’s end the treaty.

NMFS – if you want to save a lot of halibut allow trawl crew 30 minutes to throw back any halibut that you can get your hands on – underway so you don’t feed the whales.

If NMFS doesn’t like anyone but hired help to throw over – tough shouldn’t force extra bycatch.

80% survival to throw overboard – short tows and throw back just have observers look/watch/time and give the crew 30 minutes to get rid of the halibut bycatch.

Count Bycatch only for halibut left aboard after 30 minutes. 

Do what’s right biologically.

Pictured above, Clem Tillion addresses the crowd as Captain Hezel receives 2013 Highliner Award.

Read more about this important issue: NPFMC 223 Plenary Sitka C-2 

US Intrepid is undergoing annual maintenance at the Curtis Wharf for the month of June

Note: No access to the vessel without permission from Fishermen's Finest

All visitors must check in at Airstream office with Securitas Security and wear a hard hat and safety glasses (at a minimum) at all times while aboard our vessel.

Vendors:  

Fusion Marine
Harris Electric
Johnson Controls
Marine Systems (MSI)
McVays (MWW)
NC Machinery (CAT)
Optimar US
Rapp Marine

Thank you to those who support us and respect our safety rules.

Fishermen's Finest ~ a team of excellence ~ our name says it all. 

The North Pacific Fishery Management Council Voted for the following Halibut Bycatch Reductions by sector today in Sitka